Death Penalty and the "Pro-Life" movement
There was an article today in the Chicago Tribune about how lethal injection may not be administered correctly in all cases, and that there is evidence possibly showing that in approximately 40% of cases, the deceased may have actually felt severe pain. As a result, several death row inmates have appealed their sentences on the grounds that lethal injection is inhuman, and violates their 8th Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment.
The death penalty perfectly illustrates the inconsistent nature of conservatives. Their compassion extends only to those with whom they can find no fault. That is why it is such hypocricy when they claim to be "pro-life". For every case, other than unborn children (and now women in permanent vegatative states), they feel absolutely no commitment to life whatsoever. In fact, most "pro-life" individuals also oppose social programs to help unmarried mothers feed and care for their children. In essence, they want the baby to be born, but after that, it is no longer their problem. Perhaps this is due to the fact that Christians believe that at the instance of birth, every human inherits the Original Sin of Adam and Eve.
I have always opposed the death penalty. In support of this position, I give all of the standard reasons:
- Minorities and the poor are much more likely to be sentenced to death than whites convicted of similar crimes.
- In my home state of Illinois, since 1976, about twice as many death row inmates have been proven innocent as have been executed.
- It costs much more to execute someone than it does to keep them in prison for the rest of their lives, due to the tremendous cost of the appeals process.
- The death penalty is not a deterrent, as evidenced by the lack of variation in violent crime rates between states with and witout the death penalty, so from a standpoint of the safety of society, the death penalty is equally effective as prison.
5 Comments:
Although all the reasons you stated against the death penalty are logical, I would ask you to explore your last point more in depth. You say that everyone is a product of their environment. At what point should individuals take responsibility for their actions, and at what point could someone be pardoned for their behaviors?
Monday, 18 April, 2005
I totally agree with anonymous there. The capitalists need to start taking responsibility for the results of the crippling poverty they create. They should of course be pardoned if they publicly repent and remit ill-gained wealth to public service.
Monday, 23 May, 2005
You said it Anonymous#2.
As far as criminals being responsibile, I don't know what the answer is. I certainly believe in seperating dangerous people from mainstream society, but I also believe that many supposedly "dangerous" people would no longer be dangerous if they were not in the same desperate situations.
Monday, 23 May, 2005
Please don't paint all conservatives with the same brush. We don't all think the same. I am conservative and I know many conservatives who are consistently pro-life. All of the reasons you give for being against the death penalty are valid. All life, from conception to natural death, has value and must be protected. I believe that there is more than just environment at work in some people who kill. Sometimes there is mental illness and sometimes there can be brain anomalies that cause anti-social or psychopathic tendencies. Regardless of what causes people to kill other people, as a society we must show that we value all life. The ability to show mercy and compassion to those who exhibit the worst of behavior is the highest and best calling for humankind.
The state does not need to kill in order to protect society from those with criminal intent. Life in prison keeps society safe and is a just and fair punishment for those who take innocent life.
Saturday, 22 October, 2005
"The ability to show mercy and compassion to those who exhibit the worst of behavior is the highest and best calling for humankind."
Good Comment.
What is it that you do believe in, as a conservative?
Monday, 24 October, 2005
Post a Comment
<< Home