May Day
The international holiday, celebrated May 1st, a week from this Sunday, in virtually every country around the world except the United States, ironically began here in Chicago during the worker's struggle for the eight hour day.
On May 1st, 1886, the American Federation of Labor declared a national strike to demand an eight hour work day. Two days later, police in Chicago fired into a crowd of striking workers at the McCormick Harvester plant, killing several workers*. The next day in Haymarket Square, a demonstration was called in response to the killings. Although the demonstration was peaceful, the police attempted to disperse the crowd, and a bomb was thrown, killing several police officers*. Eight labor leaders were arrested, seven of which were not even present at the time of the bombing. With no evidence linking them to the crime, they were tried based on their beliefs, and some to all* were sentenced to death.
*In researching this holiday, I found tremendous discrepencies in the numbers. The number of workers killed by police during the McCormick Harvester strike ranges from 1-4, the number of police killed in Haymarket Square ranges from 2-15, and the number of individuals sentenced to death ranged from 5-8. The description of the history depends entirely on the source. Conservative sites, who still seem to still see this as a communist plot, manipulated the numbers in their favor, and also gave very detailed descriptions of the killed police officers' identitys and the supposed brutality of their deaths, but described the worker's deaths as simply "a shooting and one fatality when police tangled with rioters." Left wing sites were equally biased.
The disparity between accounts of the events, as well as the lack of recognition of the holiday here in the US, where it began, demonstrate that Americans are losing the struggle for workers rights. The eight hour work day is all but gone. Workers are only entitled to overtime after working more than forty hours per week, and even that is under attack by conservatives. Just last year, the Department of Labor regulations were changed, reclassifying more than eight million workers as "management" and thus not entitled to overtime pay.
May 1st was officially recognized as "Loyalty Day" in the 1920's to contrast what was seen as a "communist" holiday. In this official proclaimation by George W. Bush in 2004, citizens are encouraged to "demonstrate their commitment to our country by supporting our military, serving each other, and teaching our young people about our history and values." Apparantly, by "teaching our young people about our history and values", he actually means creating a ridiculous holiday to attempt to erase aspects of history which he would rather we forget.
5 Comments:
Your research on Haymarket illustrates the same point as the Presidential Proclamation.
History is a fiction written by the victors. Mao put it another way, "Truth is dictated down the barrell of a gun"
I've never been a big fan of workers rights, or rights in general, as these are also fictions. True Autonomy encompasses all these so-called rights and any government which cannot garauntee this basic freedom (read:any govt.) is a tyranny plain and simple. We live where we live, facing the same problems as others face where they live, just with a slightly different character. Nothing ever changes. In the words of CRASS "It's all the fucking same."
Tuesday, 19 April, 2005
Thank you for your comments.
I understand how you can see a government which cannot garauntee to protect it's citizens from some abuses and exploitation to be tyranny, but how can autonomy garauntee anything? If under the current system, truth is dictated down the barrel of a gun, under autonomy everything is dictated down the barrel of a gun.
Wednesday, 20 April, 2005
The assumption here is that people WANT to subjugate others, and when given total freedom will do so.
There's a certain faith in people that's required for a society to function with any amount of liberty. Anarchism is the extreme reliance on people to manage their own affairs in a peaceful and just manner.
In the absence of this faith, the moment one accepts the assumption that people are basically unjust, laws and governments are required. A just culture can accept and make just any political system that it finds itself under, including no political system.
Looking to political rather than cultural solutions to injustice is just more of the same. We got where we are because people thought they knew what was just and right for all people, and so see no problem applying unilateral solutions.
Saturday, 30 April, 2005
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Monday, 09 May, 2005
I think that a lot of people generally do want to subjugate others.
If this were not the case, I agree that the necessity of systems of government diminishes significantly, but protection against aggressors is not the only function of government. Aside from working to prevent the exploitation of others, government must also work proactively to provide for those who, for one reason or another, can not provide for themselves.
I suppose that this too can be addressed socially, rather than politically, but social change is much more difficult than political change, and until people start to care about the well being of people they do not directly know, government is necessary.
I don't know a lot about the fundamental beliefs of socialism, so I may be wrong here, but don't many socialists believe that government is only a short-term solution? After living under socialism for long enough, they believe members of society will eventually stop competing with and exploiting each other, so systems of government will no longer be necessary.
Monday, 09 May, 2005
Post a Comment
<< Home